I've been struggling, trying to explain this the standard way, starting at the tiniest level and building upon that. I'd work my way, layer upon layer, all the way up to the Eververse, the loop and the active philosophy I've perched on top of it.

The problem that I kept running up against is that at the base level are the theories I least understand. Also they are extremely hard to envision and comprehend. Beyond that they won't be important to most people. Imagine explaining that matter is made of atoms and mostly empty space to someone, while having no textbooks, no schooling and no existing science lending these ideas authority.

I'm thinking now of starting at the bigger picture and drilling down. A person reading could jump out at the level at which they feel they don't need to understand any more but still would already have read the 'important parts.'

I've broken everything down into nine categories. Each sits upon the knowledge of the other. It's a counter intuitive way to learn but I'll try to link up, down and sideways. I will also repeat myself - a lot. Plus there is a  Glossary.

Divergence

So from Sid's memories I see the following differences:

• A 9D cube pixel being the tiniest unit.
  
• Not fixed Planck lengths of time but frames of choice at variable and changing periods between choice.
• Their causality loop is very close.
• They don't speak of layers of consciousness.
• They almost but not quite touch on consciousness shaping reality.
• And they don't wrap a bow on it with causal feedback spirals.

But the rest is bang on, which is extremely impressive. Especially so if you consider they came the hard way around and understand the underlying mathematics and science.

Nine chapters follow divided into three groups. They could be studied from the bottom up if under standing the why is more important to you or from the top down if the doing is what matters. Personally I recommend top down. At the very least read "The Philosophy" first even if you start on the other end.